An examination of the relationship between early maladaptive schemas, coping, and emotional response to athletic injury

Title

An examination of the relationship between early maladaptive schemas, coping, and emotional response to athletic injury

Reference

Gallagher, B. V., & Gardner, F. L. (2007). An examination of the relationship between early maladaptive schemas, coping, and emotional response to athletic injury. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 1(1), 47-67. doi:10.1123/jcsp.1.1.47

Abstract

The present study examined the relationship between cognitive vulnerabilities, coping strategy, and emotional response to athletic injury among 40 NCAA Division I injured athletes. It was hypothesized that the presence of early maladaptive schemas (EMS) and avoidant coping strategies would predict greater emotional distress among injured athletes. Early maladaptive schemas were assessed by the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form, which injured athletes completed upon injury. Coping strategies were measured by the Coping Response Inventory Adult Form, which was completed upon the completion of recovery. The Profile of Mood States was used to assess mood, and was completed during three phases of injury: upon injury, middle of rehabilitation, and upon recovery. As predicted, hierarchical multiple regression analysis demonstrate that EMSs and avoidance-focused coping were associated with higher levels of negative mood among injured athletes. The results also indicate that the relationship between EMS and mood vary based on the phase of injury, suggesting that different EMSs are differentially related to subtle differences in stressors encountered during each phase of the injury process. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)

Keywords

early maladaptive schemas; coping responses; emotional response; athletic injury; cognitive vulnerabilities; Athletes; Coping Behavior; Emotional Responses; Injuries; Sports; Distress; Schema; Susceptibility (Disorders); Athletic Injuries;

Country

USA

Sample type

General population - undergraduate students

Study focus

Schema domains

Study design

Correlational